APOLLO TYRES / VREDESTEIN TYRES Vredestein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5

DLG-APPROVED: "Resources protection through soil preservation and fuel saving"

Image DLG-APPROVED for APOLLO TYRES / VREDESTEIN TYRES Vredestein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5

Download print version

Test Report 7434

The approval

A test mark “DLG APPROVED for individual criteria” is awarded for agricultural products which have successfully fulfilled a scope-reduced usability testing conducted by DLG according to independent and recognized evaluation criteria. The test is intended to highlight particular innovations and key criteria of the test object. The test may contain criteria from the DLG test scope for overall tests, or focus on other value-determining characteristics and properties of the test object.
The minimum requirements, test conditions and procedures as well as the evaluation bases of the test results will be specified in consultation with an expert group of DLG. They correspond with the recognised rules of technology, as well as scientific and agricultural knowledge and requirements. The successful testing is concluded with the publication of a test report, as well as the awarding of the test mark, which is valid for five years from the date of awarding.
The present test was conducted with the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D agricultural trailer tyre. The DLG test module “Resources Protection” was tested.

Agricultural tyres are an important component of agricultural machinery and vehicles. They have to cope with different surfaces and loads, withstand different speeds, and all that while maintaining consistent performance and a long service life. The requirements for agricultural tyres are varied and demanding. There are many different types of agricultural tyres suitable for different applications. The variety of application areas is large and ranges from soil cultivation to harvesting to transporting goods.

The DLG test module “Resources Protection” includes measurements on the effects of tyres on the soil and on fuel consumption under practical conditions. For this purpose, the corresponding generated wheel contact areas and track depths were measured with different tyre infla­tion pressures at constant loading and driving speed, as well as the generated soil pressures at 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm soil depth when driving over and the resulting penetration resistances after driving over. In addition, fuel consumption is determined during the measurement runs.

Other criteria were not tested.

Image APOLLO TYRES / VREDESTEIN TYRES Vredestein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5

Assessment in brief

The agricultural trailer tyre Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D was able to convince in the DLG test with the specified test criteria. Based on the results achieved, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D agricultural trailer tyre is awarded with the DLG-APPROVED quality mark for the test module “Resources Protection”.

Within the group of VF tyres tested, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D measured the largest wheel contact areas at each of the three set infla­tion pressures. At the lowest infla­tion pressure, the wheel contact area of the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D was 16 % larger compared to the standard tyre and 8 % to 14 % larger compared to the other VF tyres.

The contact surface pressure can be reduced from 1.35 kg/cm² to 0.92 kg/cm² (-32 %) by reducing the tyre pressure by 2.2 bar with the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D. This has a significant impact on soil protec­tion, because a lower contact surface pressure means a smaller track depth and also a lower soil pressure in the deep soil layers.

The pressure measured under the the track in the soil decreases with a higher depth, when driving over. The larger the wheel contact area, the lower the measured pressure at depth. The exerted ground pressure is higher for the standard tyre than for the VF tyres in all test variants. Within the VF premium range, there is little difference in soil pressure between the tyres tested at 20 cm soil depth with the higher infla­tion pressures. When the tyre pressure is low, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D produces a ground pressure that is 15 % to 20 % lower than the other VF tyres tested at a ground depth of 20 cm. At a ground depth of 40 cm, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D has the lowest value of 0.12 bar ground pressure at 1.0 bar infla­tion pressure, both in the premium VF tyre range and across all tyre variants used in the test. In the test carried out, the ground pressure generated was 50 % lower compared to
the budget VF tyres (0.12 bar vs. 0.24 bar) and 25 % and 30 % lower compared to the VF tyres from the premium segment (0 .12 bar vs. 0.16 bar or 0.18 bar).

The correlation between the contact area, the contact area pressure and the resulting ground pressure becomes visible through the generated track depth. As the track depth increases, so does the risk of compaction and the need for more intensive tillage to loosen and level the tracks. The Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D produced the lowest track depths in all three infla­tion pressures in the test conducted. On average across all infla­tion pressure variants, its track depth was 24 % lower than that of the runner-up of the VF competitors.

Depending on the design and construction, the different tyres behave differently in the track and dissipate the force in different directions into the ground. Such design-related differences are shown in the test by different penetration resistances in the shoulder or in the center of the tyre track. Increasing penetration resistance is measured in the shoulder of the tyre track as the tyre’s infla­tion pressure decreases. Compared to the other tested tyres, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D is in the lower to medium range. In the center of the tyre track, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D tends to have higher values, but these are still well below the measured penetration resistances of VF Premium reference tyres B.

The measured fuel consumptions are subject to a strong scattering, so that some of the obtained results can only be evaluated as tendencies. In the test conducted, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D had the lowest fuel consumption in the 1.7 bar infla­tion pressure variant when compared with the other VF tyres.

The fuel consumption determined for the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D in this tyre pressure variant was 14.9 l/hr and around 1 l/h (VF reference tyre B-Premium) to 3 l/h (VF reference tyre C-Budget) lower than for the other VF tyres tested.

Table 1: Overview of results

Dlg Quality profileEvaluation*
Soil preservation 
Wheel contact area
■■■■■
Ground pressure
■■■■■
Track depth
■■■■■
Penetration resistance in the soil
■■■■■
Fuel saving 
 
■■■■


* Der DLG test framework provides the following options in its evaluation schemes:  
 ■ ■ or better = meets, exceeds or clearly exceeds the specified DLG standard, ■ ■  = meetsthe legal requirements for marketability,  =failed

The product

The method

The aim of testing agricultural trailer tyres in the DLG Testing Module “Resources Protection” is to examine agricultural trailer tyres in terms of their effect on the soil and fuel consumption during field use.

For this purpose, the tyres to be tested are mounted on suitable vehicles and driven in field tests under practical operating conditions. For the test drives, a driving speed that is customary in practice during simulated field work is defined and kept constant. The measurements are carried out with three infla­tion pressure settings. The tyre pressures to be set are determined as a function of the actual wheel loads applied during the test via the manufacturer infla­tion pressure tables determined according to the following procedure:

  • Maximum (nominal) permissible infla­tion pressure (IPMAX)
  • Medium infla­tion pressure according to manufacturer’s specifications with determined load capacity for 50 km/hr
  • Minimum infla­tion pressure according to manufacturer’s specifications with determined load capacity for 10 km/hr (IPMIN).

To classify the measurement results, comparative tests are carried out in the test with reference tyres available on the market.
The test runs are carried out on suitable agricultural land under equal conditions. The test areas must be sufficiently large, homogeneous, even and well prepared for the work to be simulated. The test areas (soil type, soil texture, vegetation if applicable, field-use history) and test conditions (weather, soil moisture and condition of the test area) are documented. The main technical parameters of the vehicles, that are relevant for the test, are recorded and documented.

The following parameters are determined as essential parameters for the evaluation in the test module “Resources Protection”:

  • Soil moisture
  • Wheel loads
  • Infla­tion pressures
  • Actual driving speed
  • Driven distance
  • Fuel consumption in l/hr
  • Wheel contact areas
  • Ground pressure during drive over at 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm ground depth (Bolling probes)
  • Track depth after passing
  • Penetration resistance after passing

Detailed account of the test results

Ground pressure

While passing, the ground pressure was mea­sured in the test using Bolling tubes.

The soil pressure and its propagation are described in the literature as isobars. The decrease of soil pressure in depth is significantly influenced by the contact area. The pressure under the track in the soil decreases with a higher depth. It is higher for the non-VF standard tyre than for the VF tyres in all test variants. At 10 cm soil depth, the pressure generated by driving over is very closely correlated with the tyre infla­tion pressure. In the deeper measurement zones (20 cm and 40 cm), the effect of the different wheel contact areas becomes apparent. The larger the wheel contact area, the lower the measured pressure at depth. At 40 cm soil depth, the VF tyres generate the lowest pressure at low infla­tion pressure due to the resulting larger contact area. At the high tyre pressures of 3.2 bar in the test, the VF tyres from the premium segment differ only slightly in the generated ground pressure at all three ground depths. This high tyre pressure was not approved for the reference tyre from the budget range, and the variant had to be driven with 2.8 bar. At medium infla­tion pressure (1.7 bar) and at low infla­tion pressure (1.0 bar), the VF tyre from the budget range tends to generate higher ground pressures than the VF tyres from the premium range at all ground depths. Within the VF Premium range, the tested tyres differ only slightly from each other at 20 cm soil depth and higher infla­tion pressures.

Figure 5: Schematic representation of the soil pressure measurement by means of Bolling tubes
Figure 5: Schematic representation of the soil pressure measurement by means of Bolling tubes

At low infla­tion pressure, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D proves 15 % to 20 % lower ground pressure at 20 cm soil depth than the other VF tyres tested. At 40 cm soil depth, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D at 1.0 bar infla­tion pressure has the lowest value of 0.12 bar ground pressure in the premium VF tyre range and across all tyre variants used in the test conducted. The generated ground pressure was 50 % lower compared to the budget VF tyre (0.12 bar vs. 0.24 bar) and 25 % to 30 % lower compared to the VF tyres from the premium segment (0.12 bar vs. 0.16 bar and 0.18 bar). These low values close to zero clearly show the potential of VF technology. Causing a soil pressure of only 0.12 bar at a depth of 40 cm with a wheel load of 7,100 kg represents a major step forward in soil preservation. Figure 6 shows the individual results.

Figure 6: Ground pressure at measurement depths of 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm
Figure 6: Ground pressure at measurement depths of 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm

Track depth

The relationship between the contact area, the contact area pressure and the resulting soil pressure can be seen in the track depth. As the track depth increases, so does the risk of compac­tion and the need for more intensive tillage to loosen and level the tracks. Figure 7 shows the track depths measured in the test under the praxis conditions.

The Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D proves the lowest track depths in all three infla­tion pressure variants in the test conducted. On average across all infla­tion tyre pressure variants, its track depth was 24 % less than that of the runnerup of the VF competitors.
 

Figure 7: Track depth
Figure 7: Track depth

Penetration resistance

After driving over, the penetra tion resistance was measured in the track with the penetrometer.

The higher the forces to be applied for pressing with the penetrometer, the more the soil was compacted by driving over. From a soil depth of approx. 25 cm, the penetrometer readings show clearly increasing indenta­tion resistances, indicating the tillage horizon. Depending on the design and construction, the different tyres behave themselves differently in the track and dissipate the force in different directions into the ground. Such design-related differences are shown in the test by different pene­tration resistances in the shoulder or in the center of the tyre track. Increasing penetration resistance is measured in the tyre track shoulders as the tyre’s infla­tion pressure decreases. Compared to the other tyres tested, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D is in the lower to medium range.

Especially in the first 0 to 15 cm measuring depth, the penetration resistances of the VF Premium reference tyre A are about twice as high as those of the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D.  The situation is reversed in the center of the track. With increasing tyre infla­tion pressures, the pene­tration resistance increases, after passing. The Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D tends towards higher values here, but these are still well below the measured pene­tra­tion resistances of VF Premium reference tyre B.

Fuel consumption

The measured fuel consumptions are subject to a strong scattering, so that some of the obtained results can only be evaluated as tendencies. The expected picture of high consumption at high infla­tion pressures is shown in Figure 9. The mean value of 17.7 [l/hr] measured across all tyres and infla­tion pressure variants is at an expected level for medium heavy work in the field. The range extends from 14.9 l/hr to 20.5 l/hr. Lowering the tyre pressure from 3.2 bar to 1.7 bar leads to a significant reduction in fuel consumption when driving in the field. The further reduction of the tyre pressure tends to lead to an increase in fuel consumption, which, however, cannot be statistically confirmed. There are certain differences in the results between the tyre variants, but these cannot be statistically confirmed due to the scattering of the individual values.

In the test conducted, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D had the lowest fuel consumption in the 1.7 bar tyre pressure variant when compared with the other VF tyres.

The fuel consumption determined for the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D in this tyre pressure variant was 14.9 l/hr and around 1 l/h (VF reference tyre B-Premium) to 3 l/h (VF reference tyre C-Budget) lower than for the other VF tyres tested. In the other two tyre pressure variants, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D also tended to have lower fuel consumption in the test.

Figure 9: Fuel consumption [l/hr] with different tyres and infla­tion pressure variants
Figure 9: Fuel consumption [l/hr] with different tyres and infla­tion pressure variants
Figure 8: Penetrometer insertion points (yellow tyre track shoulder and green center)
Figure 8: Penetrometer insertion points (yellow tyre track shoulder and green center)

Summary

VF technology also represents a significant improvement in the trailer tyre segment. According to the authors, factors such as soil preservation (track depth, soil pressure or penetration resistance) are to be weighted higher than fuel consumption for the farmer and society.

Within the tested tyres, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D measured the largest wheel contact areas at all three set infla­tion pressures, which had a positive effect on the corresponding soil pressures. At the lowest tyre pressure, the wheel contact areas of the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D were 16 % larger compared to the standard tyre and 8 % to 14 % larger compared to the other VF tyres.

The new development of Vrede­stein, the Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187 D, had a contact area pressure of less than one kg/cm² (0.92 kg/cm²) at 1.0 bar air pressure, making it the only tyre with a value below 1 out of 5 different tyres tested. This sets new standards in the segment of trailer tyres, which have to cope with high and changing wheel loads.

At 40 cm soil depth, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D at 1.0 bar infla­tion pressure had the lowest value with 0.12 bar ground ­pres­sure. In the test carried out, the ground pressure generated was 50 % lower compared to the budget VF tyres (0.12 bar vs. 0.24 bar) and 25 % and 30 % lower com­pared to the VF tyres from the premium segment (0.12 bar vs. 0.16 bar or 0.18 bar).

These low values close to zero clearly show the potential of VF technology. With a wheel load of 7,100 kg, causing a soil pressure of only 0.12 bar at a depth of 40 cm represents a major step forward in soil preservation.

On average across all tyre pres­sures, the Vrede­stein Flota­tion Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D proved a 24 % less track depth than the runner-up in the VF range. The penetration resistances measured in the tyre track shoulders of the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D are in the lower to medium range compared to the other tyres tested. The Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D tended to have a higher penetration resistance in the center of the tyre track, but this is still well below the measured penetration resis­tance of other VF Premium reference tyres.

In the test carried out, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60 R30.5 187D had the lowest fuel consumption in the 1.7 bar infla­tion pressure variant when compared with the other VF tyres. In the other two pressure variants, the Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D also tended towards lower fuel consumption in the test.

The agricultural trailer tyre Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60 R30.5 187D was able to convince with the specified test criteria in the conducted DLG test. Based on the results achieved, the agr­icultural trailer tyre Vrede­stein Flotation Optimall VF 750/60R30.5 187D is awarded with the DLG-APPROVED quality mark for the “Resources Protection” test module.

Manufacturer and applicant

Applicant

APOLLO TYRES (Europe) B.V. /
VREDESTEIN TYRES
P.O. Box 27, 7500 AA Enschede
The Netherlands

Test performed by

Testing agency
DLG TestService GmbH, Gross-Umstadt location, Germany, in cooperation with the Kiel University
of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. Agricultural Engineering
The tests are conducted on behalf of DLG e.V.

Head of Department
Stefano Mastrogiovanni

DLG test framework
Vehicle technology

Test engineer(s)
Prof. Dr. Yves Reckleben (University of Applied Sciences Kiel)
Dr. Ulrich Rubenschuh (DLG)*

*Author

Contact us

DLG TestService GmbH - Groß-Umstadt location • Max-Eyth-Weg 1 • 64823 Groß-Umstadt • Tel: +49 69 24 788-600 • tech@DLG.org